Since gaining popularity in the previous couple of years, Generative AI has permeated various industries beyond our expectations. Many startups and enormous tech corporations have swiftly entered the market with their Generative AI solutions. As an example, Microsoft’s integration of DALL-E into Bing and Meta’s Voicebox are only just a few examples that may produce high-quality AI-generated content.

That is just the tip of the iceberg. There are many AI tools already available out there that may generate video content, music, voice, and text.

As AI gains the flexibility to generate a wide selection of realistic content, concerns emerge regarding its impact on content creators. As an example, artists are protesting that AI image generators use their work without permission or compensation.

Hence, in this text, we’ll touch upon how AI-generated media is affecting the work of content creators.

Synthetic Media – A Threat to Skilled Creators?

As AI-generated content (like deepfakes or photorealistic images and videos) flood the web, creators grow to be more frightened concerning the capabilities of Generative AI. The principal query here is: If AI can create skilled content much quicker, what does the long run seem like for human creators? Let’s assess the present landscape.

Rapid advancement in AI-generated speech has shown great potential to mimic the human voice with impressive accuracy. Hollywood unions for actors and writers are concerned that AI systems will eventually replace them. Also they are concerned that their creative work is getting used to coach these AI systems. Unions are arguing that using AI should be disclosed, and the relevant actors, writers, and performers needs to be compensated of their contracts.

There are a lot of other platforms have began endorsing AI-generated content. For instance, Shutterstock has announced that, with the assistance of OpenAI, it is going to begin selling AI-generated stock imagery. This raises concerns as DALL-E2, the AI model used to generate the photographs, will produce content that competes with the identical artists whose work was used to coach it. To resolve this issue, Shutterstock has promised to reimburse creators affected by AI art models.

Adobe has also embraced Generative AI, leading to controversy amongst digital creators and artists. Hence, Adobe has introduced a creator-friendly family of tools referred to as Firefly to reduce the creators’ concerns over copyright issues.

Copyright Confusion

The rise of AI-generated content has blurred the boundaries of ownership, resulting in an uproar amongst artists and creators. As an example, on May 4, Heart On My Sleeve, a song supposedly created by Drake and The Weekend, was released on TikTok, racking up about 15 million views on the platform. Nevertheless, on further investigation, it turned out that neither of the artists had made the song. As a substitute, it was created by a TikTok user using AI.

Universal Music Group, a music company that manages Drake’s music, has tried to get the song links removed, however it is already all around the web. This incident has highlighted the challenges and implementation of copyright law for AI media.

Based on the U.S. Copyright Office, copyright law generally associates authorship with human creators. Consequently, works produced solely by AI with none human influence or input are typically ineligible for copyright protection.

Nevertheless, AI-generated content typically involves human influence in some form, which implies that copyright law can apply. As an example, we must determine copyright ownership if the AI system is trained using human-generated or real-world data. Which means that the consequence of such systems could fall under derivative work, which is often protected by copyright law.

So, currently, the legal system is attempting to determine the nuances of Generative AI solutions and the way they’ll affect the creative rights of people.

Human Creativity

All things aside, the one thing AI cannot replace is human creativity, a minimum of for now. It lacks the emotions, personal experiences, and keenness that goes into creating art.

Moreover, every AI model or product relies on human work, either scraped from the web or curated offline. Subsequently, AI models can only be as creative as the information they’re trained on. They lack the flexibility to invent latest art styles, rhythms, or storylines.

As AI becomes more mainstream, authorities must set guidelines and limits to guard creators and artists. Nevertheless, this will likely be difficult because the guidelines must not hinder technology innovation as well. Combining artificial and human intelligence can open up latest avenues for creativity.

For more information on AI advancements, visit unite.ai.