The Latest York Times (NYT) article introducing the recent activities of 9-dan Lee Sedol is being criticized by many individuals. It’s because of the nuance that plainly artificial intelligence (AI) is trampling on human creativity. There was also criticism that it was “complete nonsense.”
On the tenth (local time), the Latest York Times introduced Lee Sedol, ninth Dan, about his feelings after losing to AlphaGo and his thoughts on AI through a piece called Global Profile.
In line with this, the ninth dan player, who quit his skilled profession three years after losing to AlphaGo, is currently giving lectures on AI and delivering the message that folks mustn’t be afraid of recent technologies and may quickly grow to be accustomed to them.
This text is being spread through Reddit and social media, and is being criticized. Especially within the tech community, the response is usually “pathetic.”
The issue just isn’t this 9-dan, however the tone of the article. This 9-dan just isn’t a pessimist, and he said that AI can replace some jobs, but it may also create some jobs. He also said that when considering how AI understands Go, it is crucial to keep in mind that humans created the sport and designed the AI system that mastered it.
However the title of this text is “Board game legend defeated by AI, warning: prepare for what happens next.” The next is “The shocking defeat by AI is a harbinger of a brand new era of uncertainty.”
There has also been a variety of criticism focused on comments like, “People was once in awe of creativity, originality, and innovation, but with the appearance of AI, a variety of that has disappeared,” and “What he considered an art form, an extension of the player’s personality and magnificence, has now been discarded for the ruthless efficiency of the algorithm.”
Because of this this ninth dan is given the role of ‘AI’s victim’. It also misleads people into considering that AI, which cannot even properly reproduce the variety of fingers, has destroyed real human creativity.
“It is a really bad article,” one user on the Y Combinator forums wrote. “It makes it appear to be the AI won the sport and it’s the top of the world and it’s his job to warn people concerning the dangers of AI.”
There have been also comments comparable to, “Has AI give you something so great that it kills real human creativity?” and “The creativity that AI kills is the bottom level of creativity.”
“Each time a latest technology comes out, these apocalyptic predictions are rampant,” one Reddit user wrote. “Predicting that AI will end every part is just plain mistaken.”
Nevertheless, in a special interview organized by Google Korea last March, the ninth Dan expressed his thoughts in a special tone.
He said that he has studied AI rather a lot for the reason that AlphaGo match, and that “we shouldn’t be too afraid of AI, but we may have to regulate the speed of development by reflecting ethical perspectives.”
A special interview conducted by Google in March
He also told Google employees all over the world who’re developing AI, “Google must be proud,” and “AI is an absolute technology that we cannot imagine a future without, and we’ll all the time support Google with gratitude.”
Meanwhile, the Latest York Times has been embroiled in a copyright lawsuit with OpenAI for the reason that starting of this yr, and has been heavily criticizing AI firms for his or her unauthorized use of knowledge.
Reporter Im Dae-jun ydj@aitimes.com
