Artificial intelligence (AI) has existed in various forms for a few years, and the essential technology behind AI has existed for the reason that Sixties at the newest. Many services which are taken as a right today, equivalent to engines like google, robot vacuum cleaners and online banking services, are based to a greater or lesser extent on artificial intelligence. Prior to now 12 months, nonetheless, AI has gone from being useful tools within the background of our on a regular basis lives to becoming common property in the shape of so-called generative AI. In December 2022, the muse/company Open AI made the AI ​​”Chat GPT” available to most of the people, and the applying became the fastest growing in history. This has contributed to a bigger, public debate concerning the use of AI in society.

The talk surrounding artificial intelligence in Norway could be described as first euphoric after which panic. Recently, some people have advocated an entire halt within the further development of artificially intelligent systems at the extent of GPT4 for no less than half a 12 months, pending regulation and security systems. At the identical time, there may be a serious debate occurring about whether AI will exterminate humanity.

The proponents consider that the most effective solution to meet the brand new technology is with lowered shoulders, a knowledge-based policy, being on the forefront of adapting the regulations and with more cooperation across national borders in Europe. There isn’t any point in pausing technology. It should only set Norway back in development in comparison with other parts of the world. Norway and Europe, with a powerful legal tradition throughout the framework of a liberal society and a regulated market economy, are thoroughly suited to adopt such latest technology, and to seek out good solutions to the challenges it brings — solutions which are higher than market players or states with no respect for privacy and private protection can rule field.

Artificial intelligence and related technology don’t exist outside of society, and it doesn’t should be treated as anything better half than other technological innovations. Norway has a broad set of legal rules and principles for which considerations the general public sector must handle and the way the private sector is allowed to develop. These rules will even apply to artificial intelligence. Where there could also be a have to develop latest rules, or where current rules need elaboration or clarification, this ought to be identified and drawn up as quickly as possible.

The laws should be interpreted and re-applied within the face of latest technology. There isn’t any reason to invest that artificially intelligent systems ought to be accountable for their very own actions. General legal rules on liability also apply to non-public individuals and corporations that use artificial intelligence of their systems.

The challenge Norway faces is that the country lacks expertise in artificial intelligence in all sectors, there is simply too little research into it and there may be little guidance for private and non-private actors in its use.

We are able to address this. At the identical time, Norway has every opportunity to cooperate more actively than today with the EU, which has come the furthest on this planet in regulating latest technology in a way that puts the interests of society and individuals at the middle, compare GDPR on privacy and the continuing work with a chunk of laws for artificial intelligence (AI Act).

Against this background, the next is proposed.

1. The Storting asks the federal government as soon as possible to present a plan for strengthening research into artificial intelligence and the importance of the usage of artificial intelligence in society, as a part of the follow-up to the Long-Term Plan for Research and Higher Education.
2. The Storting asks the federal government to scale up the variety of study places allocated to artificial intelligence inside educational areas equivalent to natural sciences, law, philosophy and ethics.
3. The Storting asks the federal government to arrange implementation of the European Union’s AI Act, with the aim that it could actually enter into force in Norway concurrently it enters into force within the EU.
4. The Storting asks the federal government to initiate work to look at how relevant facets of the Norwegian regulatory framework are to be interpreted and applied in light of the usage of artificial intelligence, including, amongst other things, the mental property rules, the criminal procedure rules, competition law and administrative regulations.
5. The Storting asks the federal government to ascertain a separate algorithm supervision.