I Think I’ll Cancel My ChatGPT Plus $20 Subscription


Image via Shutterstock (edited with Canva)

Last week, I subscribed to ChatGPT Plus, but I feel I’ll cancel my subscription soon.

I really like ChatGPT, so once I first saw that ChatGPT Plus was available in my region I assumed it’ll be a great idea to provide it a try. The predominant difference between the free and paid version are these.

Which means with the paid version we wouldn’t get the annoying message “too many requests in 1 hour. try again later.” Nevertheless, I didn’t subscribe for this reason. I almost never had trouble using ChatGPT even when the demand was high.

The predominant reason for me to upgrade to ChatGPT Plus was speed. I heard that ChatGPT Plus had a Turbo mode that was faster than the one we have now within the free plan.

And that’s true.

Nevertheless, it wasn’t as fast as I expected (a minimum of not value it $20/month).

Let’s see if ChatGPT Plus is value it for you. I’ll test ChatGPT and ChatGPT Plus with prompts that generate 100, 1000, and greater than 1000 words.

Test #1: Easy prompt to generate lower than 100 words

First, I used each ChatGPT Plus (left) and free ChatGPT (right), to generate a SQL query through the prompt below.

A question to list the names of the departments which employed greater than 10 employees within the last 3 months. Consider the next SQL tables with their properties: # Worker(id, name, department_id), # Department(id, name, address), # Salary_Payments(id, employee_id, amount, date)

ChatGPT Plus took around 7 seconds to do that, while free ChatGPT needed 38 seconds. ChatGPT Plus is 31 seconds faster.

To be certain this wasn’t a coincidence, I tested each versions of ChatGPT with one other easy prompt.

send an email from “email_1” to “email_2” with the topic “Email sent by ChatGPT” and the content “ChatGPT rocks!” using Python

ChatGPT Plus did it in 14s, while free ChatGPT did it in 47s.

Again, a minimum of 30 seconds faster. This isn’t bad, but I expected faster results for the paid version. This may occasionally seem insignificant when generating lower than 100 words, but speed is relevant when giving ChatGPT more complex requests.

Let’s take a look.

Test #2: Prompt to generate lower than 1000 words

The gap in speed between the free and paid version ought to be greater the more characters they must generate, so I made them each simulate a job interview conversation with a maximum of 1000 words (Yow will discover this and 100+ prompts on my free cheat sheet)

Simulate a job interview for a software engineer position by asking and answering questions as for those who are a possible employer and I’m the candidate . Consider that I’ve only taken online courses and don’t have any working experience. Generate 1000 words

Listed below are the outcomes.

This time I pressed the stop button 5 seconds after the test ended (Oops!). Anyway, ChatGPT Plus generated 655 words in 1 minute and a pair of seconds, while free ChatGPT generated 589 words in 1 minute and 53 seconds.

Now we have now a 51-second gap.

This looks good, but to be honest I wouldn’t pay $20 a month to attend 1 minute to generate 600 words.

Actually, I already get that speed from OpenAI Playground.

Yes, Playground isn’t the exact same as ChatGPT, but for a few of us, Playground’s features can be enough. Besides, they provide you with an $18 credit which ought to be good enough for the 3-month trial.

Again, I wouldn’t pay $20 for a “faster response speed,” which isn’t that fast with regards to generating 1000’s of tokens.

In my final test, we’ll see this a lot better.

Test #3: Prompt to generate an entire website

For my last test, I take advantage of each versions of ChatGPT to generate Python code and HTML code to construct a web site. The prompt is sort of long, nevertheless it helped me construct almost the entire website from scratch (for more information about constructing a web site with ChatGPT, watch my YouTube tutorial)

First I asked ChatGPT to generate only the Python code. It took ChatGPT Plus 36 seconds, while free ChatGPT did it in 1 minute and 51 seconds BUT free ChatGPT also generated a part of the HTML code (I didn’t ask for it though).

Anyway, I needed to type “proceed” on free ChatGPT to generate the remainder of the HTML code and ask ChatGPT Plus to generate the HTML code for the primary time.

Considering each the Python and HTML code, it took ChatGPT Plus 1 minute and 16 seconds, while it took 2 minutes and 16 seconds for the free version.

ChatGPT Plus is indeed faster than ChatGPT, however the boost in speed isn’t value $20. I do know that this subscription plan will help OpenAI make ChatGPT free to make use of, but I don’t think the value is affordable considering that now free engines like google like Microsoft Bing have some ChatGPT functionalities.


What are your thoughts on this topic?
Let us know in the comments below.


Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trapanese lofi
trapanese lofi
4 months ago

trapanese lofi

asian trap beat
asian trap beat
4 months ago

asian trap beat

Share this article

Recent posts

Samsung Electronics develops the industry’s first ‘36GB HBM3E 12H’… “Optimal revolutionary product for AI services”

Samsung Electronics succeeded in developing the industry's first 36 gigabyte (GB) HBM3 12-layer stacked DRAM. Through this, the corporate plans to take the...

Humane-SKT partnership launches first AI device 'Ai Pin' in Korea

Humain's 'Ai Pin', well referred to as the primary artificial intelligence (AI) hardware device, will likely be released in Korea. Humain announced a strategic partnership...

Bans on deepfakes take us only to this point—here’s what we really want

Rules that require all AI-generated content to be watermarked are unattainable to implement, and it’s also highly possible that watermarks could find yourself...

Empathetic AI: Transforming Mental Healthcare and Beyond with Emotional Intelligence

In an era where technology and humanity increasingly intertwine, the rise of empathetic AI represents a major step forward in bridging the gap between...

Recent comments

AeroSlim Weight loss price on NIA holds AI Ethics Idea Contest Awards Ceremony
skapa binance-konto on LLMs and the Emerging ML Tech Stack
бнанс рестраця для США on Model Evaluation in Time Series Forecasting
Bonus Pendaftaran Binance on Meet Our Fleet
Créer un compte gratuit on About Me — How I give AI artists a hand
To tài khon binance on China completely blocks ‘Chat GPT’
Regístrese para obtener 100 USDT on Reducing bias and improving safety in DALL·E 2
crystal teeth whitening on What babies can teach AI
binance referral bonus on DALL·E API now available in public beta
www.binance.com prihlásení on Neural Networks and Life
Büyü Yapılmışsa Nasıl Bozulur on Introduction to PyTorch: from training loop to prediction
yıldızname on OpenAI Function Calling
Kısmet Bağlılığını Çözmek İçin Dua on Examining Flights within the U.S. with AWS and Power BI
Kısmet Bağlılığını Çözmek İçin Dua on How Meta’s AI Generates Music Based on a Reference Melody
Kısmet Bağlılığını Çözmek İçin Dua on ‘이루다’의 스캐터랩, 기업용 AI 시장에 도전장
uçak oyunu bahis on Thanks!
para kazandıran uçak oyunu on Make Machine Learning Work for You
medyum on Teaching with AI
aviator oyunu oyna on Machine Learning for Beginners !
yıldızname on Final DXA-nation
adet kanı büyüsü on ‘Fake ChatGPT’ app on the App Store
Eşini Eve Bağlamak İçin Dua on LLMs and the Emerging ML Tech Stack
aviator oyunu oyna on AI as Artist’s Augmentation
Büyü Yapılmışsa Nasıl Bozulur on Some Guy Is Trying To Turn $100 Into $100,000 With ChatGPT
Eşini Eve Bağlamak İçin Dua on Latest embedding models and API updates
Kısmet Bağlılığını Çözmek İçin Dua on Jorge Torres, Co-founder & CEO of MindsDB – Interview Series
gideni geri getiren büyü on Joining the battle against health care bias
uçak oyunu bahis on A faster method to teach a robot
uçak oyunu bahis on Introducing the GPT Store
para kazandıran uçak oyunu on Upgrading AI-powered travel products to first-class
para kazandıran uçak oyunu on 10 Best AI Scheduling Assistants (September 2023)
aviator oyunu oyna on 🤗Hugging Face Transformers Agent
Kısmet Bağlılığını Çözmek İçin Dua on Time Series Prediction with Transformers
para kazandıran uçak oyunu on How China is regulating robotaxis
bağlanma büyüsü on MLflow on Cloud
para kazandıran uçak oyunu on Can The 2024 US Elections Leverage Generative AI?
Canbar Büyüsü on The reverse imitation game
bağlanma büyüsü on The NYU AI School Returns Summer 2023
para kazandıran uçak oyunu on Beyond ChatGPT; AI Agent: A Recent World of Staff
Büyü Yapılmışsa Nasıl Bozulur on The Murky World of AI and Copyright
gideni geri getiren büyü on ‘Midjourney 5.2’ creates magical images
Büyü Yapılmışsa Nasıl Bozulur on Microsoft launches the brand new Bing, with ChatGPT inbuilt
gideni geri getiren büyü on MemCon 2023: We’ll Be There — Will You?
adet kanı büyüsü on Meet the Fellow: Umang Bhatt
aviator oyunu oyna on Meet the Fellow: Umang Bhatt
abrir uma conta na binance on The reverse imitation game
código de indicac~ao binance on Neural Networks and Life
Larry Devin Vaughn Wall on How China is regulating robotaxis
Jon Aron Devon Bond on How China is regulating robotaxis
otvorenie úctu na binance on Evolution of Blockchain by DLC
puravive reviews consumer reports on AI-Driven Platform Could Streamline Drug Development
puravive reviews consumer reports on How OpenAI is approaching 2024 worldwide elections
www.binance.com Registrácia on DALL·E now available in beta