It is understood that generative artificial intelligence (AI) is acting as an enormous variable within the EU’s ‘Artificial Intelligence Act (AI ACT)’. The announcement of the draft, which was scheduled for this spring, has been delayed for this reason.
Reuters reported on the twenty second (local time), citing internal sources, that the rapid development of generative AI comparable to ‘ChatGPT’ is delaying the agreement of EU lawmakers coordinating AI laws.
In keeping with this, the European Parliament has been scuffling with drafting and agreement for nearly two years to enact the EU’s AI law, but in recent months, recent phenomena have been revealed on account of recent generation AI, they usually are scuffling with tips on how to take care of it.
Until last month, it was predicted that an agreement on key matters comparable to the definition of AI can be reached, and that a 108-page AI law draft might be published in March.
Particularly, since LLMs (Large Language Models) can proceed to expand applied AI models, it seems that the EU has included them in one other category called ‘general purpose AI systems (GPAIS)’.
The EU categorizes AI into 4 stages based on the extent of risk: ▲unacceptable risk (prohibited use) ▲high risk ▲limited risk and ▲minimum risk.
Daniel Leper, chief policy analyst at Access Now, said, “The issue is that other technologies emerge before we even add regulations to match recent technologies. that,” he identified.
Vast and complicated processes have also been shown to play a job. EU MPs have to agree on greater than 3,000 amendments, from the creation of a recent AI office to the detailed rules of the law.
Brando Benipay, an Italian EU member of parliament, said, “It is kind of complicated and takes an extended time because one issue must be discussed with 20 members every time, in addition to many other committees involved.”
In consequence, there are predictions that the announcement of the law, originally scheduled for the top of the 12 months, could also be delayed. Alternatively, with the EU parliamentary elections approaching, it is understood that the pressure to process bills before that can be a variable.
Regarding this, analyst Leper raised his voice, saying, “We must always not rush to conclude discussions or compromise moderately on vital issues at stake for the people’s rights.”
Reporter Lim Dae-jun ydj@aitimes.com