you heard that the human attention span is shorter than that of a goldfish?
In accordance with Microsoft’s 2015 study, the common human attention span decreased from 12 seconds in 2000 to eight seconds in 2013. The identical report stated (using a really straightforward visual) that this fact officially allowed us to supersede goldfish, which achieved a whopping results of 9 seconds [1].
Perhaps luckily for us, this claim lacked solid peer-reviewed research and has since been criticized. The “goldfish” comparison was used more for shock value than for scientific accuracy. The concept that goldfish have a 9-second attention span also originates from hype, not rigorous scientific research. As a matter of fact, goldfish can remember tasks for months and learn spatial routes [2], [3].
Nevertheless, the authors of that research weren’t that far-off from more realistic values. Multiple surveys and reviews indicate that the time we stay focused on a single screen has decreased from roughly 2.5 minutes in 2004 to simply about 47 seconds now. The explanations include stress, anxiety, sleep issues, and constant notifications, in addition to multitasking or continually checking your cell phone for brand spanking new messages [4].
People are usually not only in a position to concentrate for just a number of minutes, but in addition they are likely to forget what they’ve heard, sometimes even immediately. We frequently forget birthdays and names; we leave a gathering without recalling what was said; we share something after which forget; and so forth [5].
Lastly, we easily get discouraged. Give me an obstacle, even a tiny one, and I’ll lose interest and focus. Take the instance of Web pages and e-commerce. A page loading 1 second longer ends in a 20% drop in conversions [6]. And, from my very own experience, obstacles like the need to choose a delivery method that shouldn’t be optimal can bring it to a whole standstill.
What’s on this post?
Here comes my point: Today, it’s really difficult to capture people’s attention and understanding. The longer we’d like to try this, the more complicated the knowledge we would like to convey, the larger the danger that we are going to fail.
In a number of of my past articles, I wrote concerning the concept of knowledge literacy [7] and chatting with individuals who are usually not data-literate [8].
Here, I would like to spotlight a distinct form of paradox: chatting with data-literate individuals who, as a result of the problems I’ve outlined earlier, often behave as in the event that they were data-illiterate. What does that mean in practice? How will we communicate with such audiences in a way that helps them truly understand, stay engaged, interact meaningfully with the content, and ultimately make informed decisions?
I can immediately say this isn’t easy. I often find myself presenting to people I do know are highly competent, well-versed in data, smart, and experienced. I invest time in crafting what I imagine is a transparent, structured narrative, supported by solid data. And yet, I fail to get through.
Why does this occur? What am I doing incorrect—or not doing yet—that might make a difference? What am I planning to vary? Let me attempt to unpack that here.
What will we use to know data literacy (and will we still use it)?
Just a few years back, data literacy was understood in a comparatively narrow, technical way. The “old” data literacy concept focused mainly on the flexibility to read, interpret, and manipulate data. It emphasized numeracy, comprehension, and proficiency with basic tools, reminiscent of using spreadsheets, charts, or statistical methods. A “data-literate” person, in that context, might need been a business analyst who could pull reports and summarize trends, a student who could interpret a graph in a textbook, a manager tracking sales in Excel, or a policymaker reading census data. Storytelling, interaction, or audience engagement were rarely a part of the conversation. It was mostly about technical understanding—not communication, persuasion, or insight.
Over time, nonetheless, the concept of knowledge literacy has been reshaped. This happened largely as a result of the popularization of data-driven storytelling by authors reminiscent of Cole Nussbaumer Knaflic, Brent Dykes, Nancy Duarte, and, to some extent, myself. Today, data literacy is not any longer nearly reading charts or crunching numbers; it also includes the flexibility to border insights effectively, engage diverse audiences, and influence decisions through clear, context-aware narratives.
In this contemporary view, context shouldn’t be just essential—it’s foundational. It decides if a given story is successful or not. Today, more data doesn’t mean more clarity. That old idea is gone. Now, the main target is on purposeful simplification. It’s about meeting audience expectations and using smart narrative design. The goal isn’t just to indicate numbers. It’s to guide decision-makers—so that they understand and act on what truly matters.
Ultimately, an important aspect of contemporary data literacy is striking a balance between objectivity and persuasion. Being data-driven doesn’t mean overwhelming individuals with raw facts; it means telling stories which are each truthful and actionable—stories that connect data to decisions in a way people can understand and trust.
Modern data literacy isn’t about knowing formulas — it’s about understanding what inquiries to ask.
It’s less about math and more about judgment, context, and skepticism. Especially now, when AI could make incorrect conclusions look polished and convincing, true data literacy means considering beyond the dashboard.
Reality of “data literacy”
Scenario: a conversation that falls apart
I walk into the room of my company’s CEO with confidence. I’ve spent hours preparing a clean, data-driven story for her. I took care of context, visualizations, and a transparent takeaway. I imagine I’ve structured it well: the “why,” the numbers, the advice.
I start presenting.
Inside a minute, she glances at her phone. Midway through a key insight, she interrupts:
“Wait—why is that this number different from what I saw last week?”
I shift gears to clarify, but in doing so, I derail the flow of my narrative.
She asks one other query, seemingly unrelated to the subject. I answer, but now I’m jumping between slides, losing track of the logic I had so rigorously built.
The main target is gone.
She’s confused.
I’m frustrated.
She doesn’t care.
We each leave the meeting unclear on what was decided—if anything.
The trap of contemporary data literacy
Is it a fake scenario? By all means not. I experienced a really similar situation myself, now not than a number of weeks ago.
And guess what? I genuinely believed I used to be perfectly prepared. I had solid, verified data, a coherent story, and a transparent objective. All the pieces was structured, logical, and relevant. In my mind, it was bulletproof. But once I presented it, something went off the rails. Despite my preparation, the meeting fell wanting expectations. Why?
When data literacy isn’t enough
In today’s high-velocity, distraction-heavy workplace, even highly data-literate professionals increasingly behave as in the event that they’re data-illiterate. This isn’t as a result of incompetence, but somewhat the environment during which all of us operate. Persons are bombarded with dashboards, KPIs, alerts, and emails across multiple platforms. It’s constant noise. The result’s cognitive overload—our brains can’t process or retain the whole lot, including relevant information.
Moreover, relentless context switching—from one meeting to the following, from technique to operations, and from product to finance—shatters any ability to focus or follow a logical data narrative from start to complete.
Even when data is presented clearly and logically, things can still go incorrect. Why? Due to one of the vital underestimated aspects in data communication: context. Misalignment around context is one among the first reasons good stories fail to land [9].
As presenters, we assume a shared understanding—that our audience knows the definitions, remembers past decisions, or views the business landscape in the identical way we do. Nonetheless, in point of fact, our audience may approach the issue from a totally different angle: short-term KPIs versus long-term goals, operational pain points versus strategic shifts, or just a distinct baseline for comparison. So, after they raise questions or challenge assumptions, it’s not because the info is incorrect—it’s because we’re not speaking their language inside their context.
This misalignment often breaks the flow of the story and undermines trust. Worse yet, in high-stakes settings, data might be interpreted not as insight but as confrontation. It triggers defensiveness, not dialogue.
The issue is magnified by the tools we now depend on. With the rise of AI-powered platforms like ChatGPT, insights are more accessible than ever. These tools can auto-generate summaries, flag anomalies, and even suggest decisions. But in addition they make it easy to mistake automation for understanding.
A clean dashboard or a natural-language summary gives people the illusion of clarity. But insight ≠ truth. It’s at all times filtered, modeled, and framed—often by machines, sometimes by people. Once we fail to query the assumptions behind these insights or skip the essential context, we fall into what I call fake data literacy: we feel informed, but we don’t engage critically with the info.
At the identical time, business decision-making is becoming increasingly rapid. Speed is rewarded; depth is sidelined. Self-service tools promise empowerment but often mask complexity, encouraging surface-level interaction. Snap judgments replace thoughtful reflection. Persons are exposed to more data than ever before—but with less time, less context, and more risk of misinterpretation.
The Recent Data Literacy
In today’s landscape, traditional data skills—reminiscent of reading charts, calculating metrics, and constructing dashboards—aren’t any longer enough. Modern data literacy means having the ability to frame insights, navigate ambiguity, and translate numbers into decisions. It’s about understanding the narrative, the emotional and political context, and the timing. It’s about knowing challenge AI-generated insights, somewhat than simply accepting them.
The brand new data literacy means:
- Learning context: understanding who the audience is and what matters to them,
- Developing the flexibility to challenge insights, especially those generated by algorithms,
- Practicing narrative considering: to guide people, not only inform them,
- Pondering beyond the dashboard: specializing in judgment, relevance, and timing.
How you can construct stories with data for (il) literates of today?
All of this might sound solid in theory—and it’s. But you may rightly ask:
When you say you were so well prepared within the scenario above, what makes you think that these strategies will work?
And here’s the honest answer: there’s no guarantee. That’s the sweetness—and the frustration—of working with people and data in today’s environment. All the pieces I’ve written about—the speed, the unpredictability, the fractured attention—creates conditions where things can go off course at any moment. The reality is, the danger of bewilderment or derailment is at all times high. And the more people within the room receiving your story, the greater the chances that something will misfire. Those risks don’t just add up—they multiply with every recent person within the audience.
Dangerous or not, I’ve developed a listing of practical steps to assist maximize probabilities of success. I’ve divided them into two parts. The primary focuses on what might be done before the meeting — preparation tactics that function your best line of defense. In spite of everything, prevention is at all times higher than a cure. But when things don’t go as planned, the second part offers in-the-moment strategies — a form of emergency kit for use through the meeting or immediately afterward to get things back on target.
Modern data literacy: prescriptive measures
Care for the anchors: All the time ensure that the audience knows what they’re taking a look at. Set clear anchors early: what’s the scenario, which KPI is under review, and what number of revenue or annual goal is in danger? Without this context, people can’t judge the importance of what you’re saying. Anchors provide context for numbers and help your audience stay oriented throughout the story.
Ensure consistency across your story: It’s not enough in your data to be technically correct—it also must align consistently with what’s been shown before and with the narrative you’re constructing. When you reference a number in a single a part of your story and show a distinct one on the screen—saying, “Oh, that wasn’t updated yet, but imagine it’s right”—you immediately lose your audience’s trust and a focus. These small inconsistencies might be significant distractions, especially for people already struggling to remain focused. Be sure all numbers, visuals, and commentaries are synchronized and up to this point, so your story feels coherent, credible, and deliberate.
State goals, key messages, and conclusions: In a world stuffed with noise, ambiguity is your enemy. Make it unmistakably clear why you’re speaking, what the audience should take away, and what motion is predicted. Don’t bury your goal in slides or hope they “get it” by the top. Say it up front: “We’re here to make a decision whether to speculate in X.” Reiterate key messages as you go, and land clearly in your conclusion. For attention-fatigued audiences, clarity isn’t a bonus—it’s a lifeline. When your purpose is sharp, your story has direction, and your audience knows engage.
Be clear concerning the point: Say exactly why you’re there and what you desire to achieve. For instance: “We’re here to make a decision on X.” State your major message early and clearly, and are available back to it throughout. Don’t assume people will pick it up from context—make it obvious. End with a transparent, actionable conclusion. If people don’t understand the goal, they won’t follow the story, and so they definitely won’t act on it.
Cut off the suspense: Don’t construct as much as your point—lead with it. Attention is proscribed, and audiences today don’t have the patience for slow reveals. State the important thing message or insight immediately, then provide the supporting data. When you wait too long, you risk losing people before you get there. Make your story easy to enter, fast to follow, and quick to understand.
Ensure a correct flow: Construct a transparent and coherent narrative. Cut the backstory all the way down to only what the audience truly needs to know the purpose. Lead with the core message, and structure your content so it flows logically from insight to motion. Eliminate distractions and side tracks—they dilute your message.
Validate, crosscheck, practice: Before you present, stress-test your story. Validate your data, double-check key numbers, and ensure that the whole lot aligns—out of your summary to your charts. Crosscheck for consistency: is your language clear, are your visuals accurate, and do all of them support the identical message? Then, practice. A dry run helps uncover weak spots, confusing transitions, or moments where your audience might wander away. The more you rehearse, the more confident and focused you’ll be when it counts.
And lastly, be a storytelling Yoda: Clarity, structure, and calm guidance—these are your tools. Speak properly, frame your thoughts rigorously, and help others see what they should see. Don’t overwhelm with data dumps or convoluted logic. As a substitute, guide your audience through the story with intention and empathy. Focus not on showing how much you realize, but on helping them understand what matters.
Modern data literacy: if things don’t go to plan…
Okay. Now that you might have done your homework, you step into the meeting room, and guess what? You get out in 20 minutes with the identical result as before.
Here’s what you possibly can do through the meeting, and after it, so that you just either further reduce the danger, or minimize losses if the bad scenario eventually materializes.
Through the Meeting
- Keep in mind that you continue to are a Storytelling Yoda. Above all, don’t panic. Remain focused in your goal, keep your composure, and don’t let the pressure shake your confidence. Calm must you stay, my apprentice…
- Re-anchor regularly: Start along with your anchors—but don’t stop there. Throughout the meeting, remind the audience of the scenario, the KPI at stake, and the business impact (e.g., “This puts 12% of our Q3 revenue in danger”). Repeating anchors help maintain orientation and reinforce relevance.
- Restate the goal when essential: If the conversation starts to stray, refocus it on the unique goal. An easy phrase, reminiscent of “Simply to refocus us—we’re here to make a decision on X,” can reset attention and make clear next steps.
- Look ahead to signals of confusion: search for cues reminiscent of silence, unrelated questions, or jumping ahead. These are signs persons are lost or disengaged. Pause, rewind to the important thing point, and make clear. Don’t power through confusion—address it openly and calmly.
- Use signposting language. This helps focus minds, especially when attention is slipping:
- “Here’s the important thing point…”
- “That is where we make the decision…”
- “Now, let’s connect that to the KPI.
- Summarize Often. Every 5–7 minutes, give a brief recap. This supports retention and decision-making:
- Why it matters
- What decision or feedback is required
- Ensure note-taking. Make sure that someone is taking notes, capturing key conclusions and takeaways, and presenting them for final alignment. Eventually, you should utilize an AI script generator (e.g., available within the Zoom app if the meeting is held online), but these are usually not at all times accurate yet, so I’d not rely solely on them.
- Steer the wave: Hyper-attentive individuals with distractions throughout them are likely to drift off-topic easily—and the more senior or essential they’re, the more likely it’s to occur. What personally annoys me (if I could share) is that once I get sidetracked, they stop me and apologize to the audience on my behalf. Nonetheless, after they derail the discussion, it’s in some way completely acceptable. Small frustration—thanks for letting me vent… And apologies for straying from the major point… 😊
Anyway, what are you able to do in such a situation?
Stay calm and steer the conversation back without calling anyone out. Use gentle framing like, “That’s an excellent point, and I believe we will link it back to…” or “Let me quickly tie that to the major KPI we’re discussing…” Your job is to ride the wave, not resist it—guide the energy back to the core message, reinforce your anchors, and protect the narrative flow without making it personal.
After the Meeting
Send a follow-up summary. Include:
- The goal of the meeting,
- Key data points and anchors
- Major conclusion or open questions,
- Next steps or decisions made.
Even when the meeting went sideways, a crisp follow-up can reframe the story and recuperate clarity.
Make clear misunderstandings promptly: If something was misinterpreted or challenged, follow up directly. Say, “Let me make clear the info we discussed—I’ve cross-checked it, and here’s the precise scenario.” Closing the loop quickly restores trust.
Document what didn’t land. Use this insight to revise your materials or story for the following time. Be aware of:
- Where people got confused
- What distracted them
- What questions disrupted the flow
Book a brief debrief (if needed): If the choice didn’t occur or felt unresolved, propose a transient follow-up session with a focused agenda: “I’d like quarter-hour to shut the loop on our discussion. I’ve tightened the important thing points for quicker alignment.”
Reflect and adjust. Ask yourself:
- Did I lead with the conclusion?
- Were my anchors clear and repeated?
- Did the audience have what they needed to act?
Each meeting is a test—and a likelihood to sharpen your delivery for next time.
Technology is to assist
… but we’d like to maintain it a bit old style.
As I used to be writing all this, one thing struck me: today, we rely heavily on technology—especially LLMs and AI agents. And that’s largely an excellent thing. These tools boost our productivity, help us scale, and simplify our lives in countless ways. But regardless of how advanced they grow to be, they’ll’t replace the depth of human interaction—real contact, real emotion, or the strain that emerges within the moment. Great preparation, perfect visuals, and even a flawless story won’t land if we forget the “human” a part of communication. We want to mix timeless skills—reminiscent of diligence, accuracy, empathy, and emotional awareness—with modern tools that help us analyze and present data effectively.
That doesn’t mean abandoning these modern tools. Nevertheless it does mean not counting on them entirely. Consider it like going to a giant concert. Have you ever been to at least one recently? A significant band, a packed venue, the energy buzzing through the gang?
Then you definitely’ve probably noticed how many individuals experience it… through their phone screens.
Personally, I don’t understand it. I prefer to experience the concert within the moment—to soak within the music, share the energy with others, perhaps even jump around (okay, perhaps not me), absorb the sights, the sounds, the smells—the whole lot. Watching it afterward a phone screen doesn’t come close. Perhaps 1% of the actual experience, and even that comes at the associated fee of missing the moment because I used to be too busy recording it.
Now, let’s compare that to how live shows felt not so way back…
See? Energetic music that gets the massive crowd dancing and jumping. Musicians use modern instruments and look futuristic. Like those state-of-the-art apps and tools we use. And now ask yourself—which version truly carries you away? The alternative is yours.
Conclusions
Data literacy today is not any longer nearly interpreting graphs or constructing dashboards; it’s also about understanding the underlying concepts and principles. It’s about navigating an environment overloaded with data, distractions, and decision pressure—where even smart, experienced professionals can behave as in the event that they’re data-illiterate. The brand new data literacy is deeply human, specializing in context, clarity, empathy, and judgment. It means knowing what matters to whom, guiding attention, and turning information into motion. While there’s no guaranteed formula to make every data story land, we will raise our odds by simplifying our messages, reinforcing meaning, and anticipating distractions. And when things go sideways—as they often will—we will adapt, recuperate, and learn. Ultimately, the flexibility to attach individuals with insight defines real data literacy today.
References
[1] Are we no higher than goldfish?, Jules M Epstein
[2] Memory like a goldfish? Why this may very well be an excellent thing
[3] Busting The Social Media Ruined Our Average Attention Span Goldfish Myth, Michael Brenner
[4] Easily distracted? How you can improve your attention span, Devi Shastri, Laura Barggeld
[5] My very own experience 🙂
[6] How website performance affects conversion rates
[7] The might of knowledge literacy, Michal Szudejko
[8] How you can speak about data and evaluation to non-data people, Michal Szudejko
[9] Power of context in data-driven storytelling, Michal Szudejko
Disclaimer
