As US President Donald Trump dismissed the top of copyright policy, the controversy over artificial intelligence (AI) learning and copyright infringement is predicted to grow. This dismissal is a measure that was made shortly after the copyright report report was released that it was difficult to see the act of using the work without permission as a ‘Fair use’.
Democrat Cho Morrell, a Democratic Party secretary of the US House of Representatives, announced in an announcement on Tuesday that President Trump dismissed the Sira Pearl Marter, who led the US copyright office.
“The dismissal of President Trump’s dismissal of the Pulmurmer Commission is a shameless and unprecedented abuse of power without legal basis,” said Morel.
The chief of the Pearl Marter was appointed as the top of the Copyright Office in 2020 because the nomination of the Carla Haydon Library on the time of the Trump first administration. But last week, President Trump was reportedly dismissed.
Trump has virtually acknowledged the dismissal by retweeting related reports on SNS platform Trus social. It is usually noteworthy that the quoted article accommodates the critical contents that “the tech industry will attempt to steal the creator’s copyright for AI revenue.”
That is more attention since it is concerning the sensitive issue of AI and copyright conflict.
The last a part of the AI copyright report released by the US Copyright Agency last week was to indicate that the ‘Fair Use’ claimed by AI firms is restricted. The report says, “The aim of research and evaluation often is the use of processes, but the usage of contents that compete with existing works out there for industrial creation exceeds the scope of process use.”
As well as, the federal government’s intervention is premature, nevertheless it is predicted that AI firms are expected to grow the ‘license market’, which pays for the usage of content to the copyright holder, and suggested that it’s needed to think about alternatives resembling the ‘collective license system’ in preparation for the market failure.
This report, which can be officially released by the Copyright Office in summer, is a very important criterion that can function a tenet for US copyright disputes. Nevertheless, some have been known that this included disadvantages to AI firms, and the US government has begun to stop, and it’s speculated that the top of the Pulmer Mother, who isn’t being dismissed, has been revealed.
Currently, several AI firms, including Open AI, are faced with copyright infringement lawsuits, they usually are also demanding laws by expanding the scope of fair use.
Musk CEO recently publicly sympathized with X (Twitter) for the abolition of all mental property (IP Act ”by former CEO of Jack Dorci.
By Park Chan, reporter cpark@aitimes.com
