The US Copyright Office (USCO) has made a policy that even the contents created by artificial intelligence (AI) could be protected if human contributions are recognized or edited. That is a very important decision that overturns the prevailing policy.
USCO released a report on Monday, the second section, ‘Copyrightability’, the second section of the report that analyzes the impact of AI on copyright and suggests recommendations for legislative and regulations.
USCO has released three cases where AI -generated content can obtain an official copyright certificate. That is the case of human beings, when the content created by humans is integrated into the output of the AI, â–² When human beings are greatly modified or arranged of the info generated by the AI, â–² human contribution is fully expressed and artistic.
As well as, the usage of AI within the creation process doesn’t mean that the work is excluded from copyright protection. For instance, when editing text, images, and music â–² When human creators create draft or preliminary ideas â–² When humans play a creative assistant while determining the ultimate expression â–² Human work is the core of the ultimate work Within the case of remaining parts, the usage of AI was introduced.
That is 180 degrees different from the case of Chris Kashcatanova, who wrote and wrote an image of the dawn of the dawn, who wrote and wrote an image with a mid -journal.
Kashinova said on the day X (Twitter), “Today’s announcement is very happy with a small progress. AI works are also copyright. Your work is very important, and AI will not be a alternative for creativity, but a tool for creativity.” I left a sworn statement. Many AI artists also welcomed them.
In fact, it doesn’t mean that human rights are recognized just by entering the prompt within the creation AI. It’s important to prove that human beings have contributed to the work along with AI in any form, similar to editing or modification.
This reaffirmed that the principle that the topic of copyright is a human being has not modified. It is usually the identical because the historical customs that apply copyright to latest technologies, similar to photographs, videos, and digital media.
USCO said the choice was the results of analyzing the general public’s response by receiving greater than 10,000 opinions from creators, legal experts, and technology firms. Nevertheless, this will not be a brand new AI copyright law because it could actually handle this problem by the present copyright law.
Meanwhile, this report is certainly one of USCO’s 2024 AI initiative, and is anticipated to be released last summer.
As well as, the report is delayed and the report on a very powerful third section, the AI ​​model training, license, and responsibility issues for works, can be delayed.
It is anticipated to incorporate guidelines for the present copyright lawsuit, which is anticipated to have the largest impact on this field.
By Dae -jun Lim, reporter ydj@aitimes.com
