For the reason that launch of OpenAI’s ‘Sora’, opinions have emerged one after one other that video-generating artificial intelligence (AI) can never replace humans to make movies, but quite will assist in movie production. This goes beyond the proven fact that Sora didn’t meet expectations, and extends to mentioning the elemental limitations of generative AI.
Business Insider interviewed film directors and experts who used Sora on the fifteenth (local time) and reported that video creation AI still has limitations. That is about fundamental issues that transcend technological limitations, comparable to consistency and video quality.
Initially, Michaela Ternaski-Holland Kim Doc identified that with the ability to produce movies with Sora is an ‘illusion of control.’ He explained this by saying, “Simply because you may have a 4K camera doesn’t make you Steven Spielberg.” He’s certainly one of the primary AI skilled directors, having screened a movie made with Sora at this 12 months’s Tribeca Film Festival.
Some even said that text generation models are more threatening than video generation AI. “Many individuals see the ‘screenplay’ as an important creative a part of a movie,” said Dana Pollan, a movie professor at Recent York University’s Tisch School of the Arts. “The cinematographer and other crew members are seen because the ones who adapt it into images.” Which means that the conch is only a tool.
Complaints about Sora continued. Coach Ternaski-Holland identified that Sora’s pace of improvement has slowed recently. He also said that there was no possibility of Sora-generated footage appearing within the film since the video quality didn’t meet expectations.
Some even said that the protests against AI by writers and actors that took place in Hollywood last 12 months were exaggerated. UCLA professor George Hwang identified, “The concept AI will take away people’s jobs is only a fantasy created by Hollywood.”
Particularly, Sean Malone, a director specializing in brief movies, said, “Van Affleck was right. The criticism and controversy raised by the artist community is absurd.”
Affleck appeared on a podcast last month and identified that AI cannot create complex situations involving complex characters. “At most, we’ll find yourself writing a typical or sloppy story and creating an Iron Man character to post on TikTok.”
Nonetheless, this technology was expected to be useful in some areas, comparable to storyboarding work to visualise the story throughout the movie script writing stage. It is usually predicted that it could replace among the computer graphics that were expensive. It was also said that if performance improves in 1-2 years, the uses may expand.
Subsequently, it is predicted that the work that Runway or Meta will soon release in collaboration with a Hollywood studio can be a piece with more human touch quite than a movie created 100% by AI.
Moreover, it was said that even when generative AI develops, it’s unlikely that producers will put it into the forefront of films.
Film producer Michael Gilkison revealed that AI was useful in making a scene where a automotive is destroyed without charge. But, he said, “you possibly can make a period piece with this technology and eliminate the necessity to hire minor actors, but it could take away from the soul of the film.”
“As a producer, you possibly can leverage AI to lower costs, but the hot button is balance,” he said.
Reporter Lim Da-jun ydj@aitimes.com
