Do you suffer from being an artist? You might be entitled to compensation

-

A deep dive into contemporary issues around AI, copyright, and the true meaning of “fair use.”

Union of Musicians and Allied Workers protesting at Spotify’s corporate headquarters in San Francisco.
That’s right you heard us, Open AI. Source: Patrick Perkins on Unsplash

In the event you’re reading this, you’re a part of the content creator ecosystem: either as a fellow author, casual consumer or a Medium subscriber. You help keep the system running, which implies you’ve a stake in the topic of today’s post, which will probably be all about copyright concerns and Generative AI.

I’ve been keeping an interested eye on this topic for some time. As each a author and someone working with “Gen AI” day-after-day, it’s in my very own personal and skilled best interests to accomplish that. In fact, copyright isn’t the one legal and ethical issue tied to Gen AI, neither is Gen AI the primary technology to boost such flags. Nonetheless, it has captured public attention on a wholly recent scale, which is why I’m diving into it today.

Let’s start with key stakeholders and significant questions. Up to now, probably the most vocal stakeholders in discourse on Generative AI and copyright law have been:

  • builders of Generative AI models,
  • consumers of such models’ outputs,
  • and content producers, whose IP may wind up in a model’s…
ASK ANA

What are your thoughts on this topic?
Let us know in the comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Share this article

Recent posts

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x