What happens when two conversational algorithms find themselves talking to one another?


Enrique Dans
IMAGE: A human hand and a robotic hand touching each other
IMAGE: Katja Anokhina — Unsplash

Two data scientists from Spotify, which is has a powerful deal with the tastes and habits of its users, have left the corporate and arrange a startup, Slang.ai, which provides technology for restaurants, hotels and stores that answers phone calls from customers and may take reservations and answer questions.

This can be a subject that has fascinated me for a while: I’ve been using recordings of Google Assistant calls in my classes and at presentations which can be unattainable to discern from a human. The query that any individual at all times asks is: what happens when two conversational algorithms encounter one another?

The reply is clear: the 2 algorithms will “converse” in human language, although doing so is, from an interaction or efficiency standpoint, is pointless. Human language, between machines, is solely a complication: the 2 computers could simply exchange the obligatory data to ascertain if the reservation is feasible, confirm the request, and update their respective databases in fractions of a second, without going through the complex technique of translation into human language.

It’s the identical with generative algorithms: there might be cases where one person uses a generative algorithm to show an easy sentence or a few topics right into a formal, long, and authentic-looking email, while one other person on the opposite side asks one other algorithm to summarize that long email right into a couple of bullet points. Stupidity based on convention, violating an obvious law of technology: it is unnecessary to make something longer; we’ve got years compressing information.

What happens when several concurrent tasks are semi-automated by algorithmic assistants? An algorithmic assistant is asked to order a table at a restaurant, and the decision is answered by one other assistant: the logical thing could be that, by way of an inaudible tone, for instance, the assistants would discover themselves, abandon human language and proceed to efficient communication by way of an easy exchange, as a substitute of conversing “as in the event that they were” people.

An inaudible… or audible tone: the whole lot indicates that the thought of “I need to know if I’m talking to a robot or an individual”, common within the early days of conversational…


What are your thoughts on this topic?
Let us know in the comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Share this article

Recent posts

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x